Readings:
- Opposing Viewpoints Search (Access at school)
- Athletic programs enhance college experience (Access at school)
- College Athletes should be paid(Access at school)
- ABC CLIO (Access at School)
- SIRS Research (Access at school)
- Frontline: Money & March Madness
- Room for debate- In the interest of students?
- Current SMU scandal
- North Carolina Scandal- How did North Carolina Lose its Way?
- Derrick Rose Controversy
- Need 3 Quick credits to play? Call Western Oklahoma.
- The Shame of College Sports
- Harbaugh's Contract
- Advice in March Madness Betting (Pro-Gambling) -Video
- NYT and Money/March Madness-Video
- Who will hold colleges accountable?
- Academic Counseling Racket
- Look at this map
- Room for Debate- Are Student athletes employees?
- Sports aren't work
- Northwestern Can't Unionize
1.
3.
Prompt:
To what extent should the NCAA be reformed as scandals continue to surround this institution? To answer this question, you will need to read about the issue. A decent place to start will be the provided links.
In your response you must establish the following:
- thesis
- evidence clearly cited from relevant sources (minimum 3)
- refute a position from the opposite side
How to kick start this...
- But is my proposal realistic? What are the chances of it actually being adopted?
- Yet is always that that______? Is it always the case, as I have been suggesting that______?
- However, does the evidence I've cited prove conclusively that________?
- "Impossible," you say. "Your ________ is flawed/skewed/unrealistic/ biased.
How to tamp back...
- Ultimately, what is at stake here is______
- X matters because _______
- My discussion of X is in fact discussing the larger issue of ______
- The evidence has important consequences for the broader discussion of_______
- Although X may seem of concern to only a small group of _______, it should in fact concern anyone who cares about _______.